A report found that fine-dining restaurants have 132 times as much bacteria as fast-food chains
Fred Prouser/Reuters A report found that fine-dining chains are harboring 100 times more bacteria than fast-food chains. While fast food has a bad reputation, there are reasons to believe it's safer to eat than the food at many fancy restaurants. Workers have less opportunities to spread bacteria, and corporate oversight cuts down on risks. President Donald Trump seems to be right about one thing — fast-food locations are less likely to have bacteria than fine-dining restaurants, according to a new report. Samples collected at three fast-food joints and three fine-dining establishments found the upscale locations to be a more likely host for germs, according to dinnerware supplier Restaurantware . The average bacteria colony count of the fast-food locations was a little over 20,000; the average colony count of the three fine-dining establishments was more than 2.7 million. Lucy Nicholson/Reuters Six samples don't make for a very complete study — but there are