One stat explains why Bernie Sanders had to spend the entire debate fending off low-polling rivals

Democratic presidential hopefuls (L-R) Mayor of South Bend, Indiana, Pete Buttigieg, US senator from Vermont Bernie Sanders and US Senator from Massachusetts Elizabeth Warren participate in the first round of the second Democratic primary debate of the 2020 presidential campaign season hosted by CNN at the Fox Theatre in Detroit, Michigan on July 30, 2019. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) / ALTERNATIVE CROP (Photo credit should read BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images)BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images

During the first night of the second batch of Democratic debates in Detroit, a fairly consistent routine would happen: Sen. Bernie Sanders would be pressed on a policy, then one of a number of rivals who had criticised that policy would respond, and the segment would descend into Sanders and perhaps fellow frontrunner Sen. Elizabeth Warren carrying on the dispute. 

In part, this repetitive process was the result of CNN's strategy in framing questions, and it was in part due to the do-or-die requirements laid out by the Democratic National Committee in order to obtain a spot in the next set of primetime debates. But largely, it's due a unique attribute shared by most of the people participating in the first debate: who else their voting constituency would vote for.

See the rest of the story at Business Insider

NOW WATCH: Why the US border facilities are 'concentration camps,' according to historians

See Also:

SEE ALSO: Here are the winners and losers of Tuesday's feisty Democratic presidential debate



from Feedburner https://ift.tt/2YxqpaJ
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering Joanne Pransky

Winging it

Time for moderation?